Logiqore
Logiqore participant testimonials

Participant Experiences

What People Say About Studying Here

Notes and reflections from past Logiqore cohorts across all three tracks.

Back to Home

4

Years Operating

180+

Participants

4.7

Avg. Rating

91%

Track Completion Rate

Reviews

In Their Own Words

WP

Wichian Pongpan

Backend Developer, Chiang Mai

The Deep Learning track filled in a lot of gaps for me. I'd read blog posts about neural networks but never really understood the training loop until working through it here in proper detail. The sessions moved at a pace where you could actually follow the reasoning.

Track 02 · May 2025

NT

Natthapat Tongsuk

Data Analyst, Bangkok (remote participant)

I took the Foundations track when I was shifting from pure data analysis toward working with ML models. The pacing was good — not too fast for someone who hadn't written Python seriously before. The project work at the end helped pull the material together in a useful way. The physical location means I had to travel for some sessions, but it was worth it.

Track 01 · April 2025

SR

Suchada Rungruang

Software Engineer, Chiang Mai

The Gen AI Studio is exactly what I needed. I'd been trying to build a small text generation tool on my own and kept getting stuck. Having facilitators who could look at what I was doing and explain specifically why something wasn't working made a big difference. My project ended up in better shape than I expected.

Track 03 · June 2025

KT

Karnchana Teerawong

University student, Mae Jo

I was studying computer science but finding that university courses moved too quickly through the ML material. The Foundations track here let me slow down and actually work through things properly. The small group format meant I wasn't embarrassed to ask questions that seemed basic. Took both Tracks 1 and 2 in sequence.

Tracks 01 & 02 · March–June 2025

MJ

Marco Janssen

Freelance developer, Chiang Mai (expat)

Solid programme. The written materials are genuinely useful — not just a printout of slides but actual documentation that explains the reasoning behind what you're doing. The Deep Learning track was intensive in places but that's appropriate for the subject. Would have liked one more session on evaluation metrics, but that's a minor point.

Track 02 · May 2025

PA

Phatsorn Auttama

Product manager, Chiang Mai

I came in as a non-developer who needed to understand what my engineering team was doing with AI systems. The Foundations track gave me a working understanding of the concepts without dumbing things down. I can read the model training code now and follow what's happening. Wasn't sure it was for me at first, but Pakorn was very helpful in working through whether it made sense before I enrolled.

Track 01 · April 2025

Case Studies

Participant Journeys in Detail

The Situation

Data analyst wanting to build models, not just use them

Natthapat had spent two years working with datasets in analytics tools but found he was always dependent on engineers when ML was involved. He wanted to understand enough to build basic models himself.

The Path

Foundations track, 5 weeks

He completed Track 01 over five weeks, working through Python data handling and then building a small classification model as the programme project. Facilitators helped him work through version conflicts in his development environment in the first week.

Where He Got To

Building and evaluating his own pipelines

By the end of the track he could write a full data-to-model pipeline independently. He enrolled in Track 02 the following month. "The jump from 'I know what a neural network is' to 'I can train one' happened here."

The Situation

Developer with a generative AI project idea but no route to build it

Suchada had a clear idea for a generative tool but had spent several weeks trying to build it alone, running into architectural decisions she didn't have the background to resolve.

The Path

Generative AI Project Studio, 11 weeks

She joined Track 03 with her project already partially defined. The first two weeks were spent restructuring the architecture before building began. Peer review sessions mid-programme gave her useful feedback on the interface design.

Where She Got To

Working application with documentation

She completed the studio with a working application, full technical documentation, and a better understanding of the tradeoffs she'd made in the design. "The project review sessions were the part I didn't expect to find useful but actually found most valuable."

Contact Logiqore

Address

67 Thanon Thaphae, Chang Moi,
Mueang Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai 50300

Hours

Mon–Fri: 9:00–18:00 · Sat: 10:00–15:00

Interested in Joining a Future Cohort?

Send us a note and we'll let you know when the next appropriate track begins and what to expect.

Send an Enquiry